Michelle (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) wakes up in an
underground bunker after being involved in a serious car crash. The man who
built the bunker, Howard (John Goodman) eventually reveals himself and tells
Michelle why she is there; there has been an attack on the surface, and if they
hope to survive, they must remain sealed in the bunker until they are certain
it’s safe to emerge. With fellow survivor Emmett (John J. Gallagher), they must
try to survive together. But is everything as it seems?
The first thing to say about 10 Cloverfield Lane is that anyone hoping for a direct sequel to Cloverfield should really temper their expectations.
This is very unlike the 2008 film, so if you expect something similar, you may
be disappointed. However, if you go in expecting a taut paranoid thriller, you
may come away as satisfied as I was. 10
Cloverfield Lane is an expert study in claustrophobic tension before revealing
its cards in a climax which may prove divisive, but which I thoroughly got
behind.
It’s important to note that this is the first feature-film
credit for Dan Trachtenberg, seeing as it might prove difficult to guess given his
apparent ease and craftsmanship. It’s always difficult to make an isolated
space interesting over an extended period of time, but Trachtenberg and
cinematographer Jeff Cutter brilliantly shoot this film so that we not only
experience the claustrophobia of the environment, but so that every character
creates a real presence within that environment. The use of close-ups and wide
shots to focus on both the individual characters and their thoughts and how
they in turn are affecting the entire group are a critical ingredient in making
the edginess all the more palpable. And when the space is meant to feel tight
for the character, the audience isn’t spared; when a character is crawling
through piping, you can almost feel the cramped space as if you were right
there with them. Trachtenberg really has a great career waiting behind the
camera, if this is anything to go by.
The cast here may be limited, but that allows for more
focused drama and more opportunities for the three main actors to shine. Mary
Elizabeth Winstead makes for a compelling heroine, as Michelle struggles with
her inability to face tough situations (highlighted in a beautifully crafted
conversation between her and Emmett) but showing the slowly building strength
within her as she comes more to grips with what is really happening. This is a
smart, likeable and relatable heroine, and Winstead goes a long way towards
selling the journey which the character goes through. As Emmett, John J.
Gallagher is effortlessly appealing; much like Michelle, Emmett is a character
with regrets in his life, and Gallagher gives the character an undercurrent of
sadness whilst doing a terrific job in emphasising Emmett’s determination to
keep the tense atmosphere within the bunker even a bit lighter. However, it’s
John Goodman who threatens to steal the show. Howard is morally edgy as soon as
he walks on screen, and Goodman does a spectacular job walking the tightrope of
emotions which would lead an audience member to be uncertain of his motives. In
one moment, he can appear tender and vulnerable, and in the other he can be a
flood of menacing aggression. It takes an actor of real talent to capture that
uncertainty and keep it going for the majority of the running-time, but Goodman
is one such actor and Howard is an intriguing character in that you’re highly
uncertain where he stands. All three actors are tremendous and ceaselessly
compelling in their scenes together, which is a mix of their skills and the
excellent screenplay by Josh Campbell, Matthew Stuecken and Damian Chazelle.
The technical credits of the film are nothing to be scoffed
at. Composer Bear McCreary (who is on a real roll with TV credits including The Walking Dead, Marvel’s Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D, Outlander
and Black Sails) provides an eerily
chilling musical accompaniment which expertly plays on the feeling of dread and
uncertainty oozing through every frame. The sound editing and mixing also adds
to the film’s intensity, with every small sound suggesting potential danger and
every large sound (particularly the rumblings for above) seeming like an
ominous hint of a great threat lurking outside the sanctuary. The editing keeps
the film moving at an impressive pace, offering clarity for each character and
allowing the atmosphere to develop without either rushing or dragging.
For best enjoyment of 10
Cloverfield Lane, I’d recommend watching the film with as little prior
knowledge as possible. The film has some genuinely effective shocks up its
sleeve, which are best experienced first whilst watching the film. But, whilst
the shocks are important to the film’s success, I would also recommend seeing
the film based on the sheer strength of the film-making elsewhere. The cast and
crew fire on nearly all cyclinders here, and whilst the third act is likely to
divide audiences, you have to be thankful for a film which not only shows so
much skill in its construction, but which gives you something for hearty
discussion. When both high quality and high potential for debate are combined,
you know you have something intriguing on your hands.
Final Verdict
Whilst different to Cloverfield,
10 Cloverfield Lane is still a
claustrophobically compelling thriller which is likely to offer audiences
plenty to discuss. The main trio of actors are all superb, the direction is
remarkably assured for a first-time feature film, the script is excellent and
the technical credits are all impressively strong. The third act may prove
divisive for some, but for this reviewer, 10
Cloverfield Lane offers unerringly tense and accomplished entertainment
which proves immensely successful in almost every area.
Final Rating: 4.5
out of 5
No comments:
Post a Comment